Nepal: Can good people make bad choices?

Congratulations to Nepal on their successful elections. The elections mark the end of the monarchy in Nepal, and hopefully of the violence of the last decade as well. In what is being reported as largely free and fair elections, the people of Nepal have finally won the right to voice their opinions.

Despite this success, I am troubled by the outcome. Early reports indicate an overwhelming victory for the Maoists, likely securing a majority of seats in the new parliament; the same Maoists who have terrorized Nepal for the last decade through violence and intimidation. Such an outcome was predicted by no one, including the Maoists who repeatedly threatened to boycott the elections.

The days and weeks ahead will begin to shed light on the future of democracy in Nepal. For many, the success of the Maoists is baffling. Answers are hard to come by, but popular theories suggest the vote was more a dismissal of the traditional parties failed policies than a vote of support for the Maoists. Also suggested is the possibility that people voted for the Maoists as a form of appeasement to end the violence that has disrupted the lives of the Nepalese.

I believe the concern over the election of the Maoists is misplaced. Democracy is not so much about outcome as it is process. Democracy establishes the rules and allows the people to determine their fate. Bestowing power to the people takes a great leap of faith. We should support the Nepalese people and honor their vote. We may be uneasy about the outcome, but we should maintain our faith in the democratic system. After all, the best aspect of a democracy is that, if you are unhappy with the outcome, there is always another election around the corner.

Published Date: April 16, 2008