CIPE recently published a Feature Service article on post-conflict reconstruction, “The New Post-Conflict Strategy: Building Domestic Capacity for Reform,” by Alex Shkolnikov, Global Program Officer at CIPE. Alex argues that while humanitarian assistance plays a valuable role in post-conflict reconstruction, it is impossible to achieve lasting peace, democracy, and prosperity unless local groups get involved and become grassroots drivers of institutional reforms aimed at building democratic market economies.
Post-conflict reconstruction is a much-discussed topic, due to the many high-profile countries featured regularly in the news. Alex’s article looks at the issue from a unique point of view and focuses on the need for local reformers to get involved in rebuilding economic and political institutions in their countries. Please read the article and come back to post your comments. We hope that the article will spark a lively discussion.
Full Abstract:
One way to approach the complex challenges of post-conflict reconstruction is to view the process as a balancing act of providing sufficient humanitarian relief without compromising longer-term development objectives. These longer-term objectives include the development of institutions – both physical infrastructure and social structures and mechanisms – that allow free market democracy to take root. Ultimately, the success of countries in building democratic governance and providing economic opportunities will be the determining factor in achieving prosperity, peace, and sustainability.
Building the reconstruction process around local groups gives credibility to the development effort and introduces a sense of accountability, as reformers ultimately become responsible for successes and failures. While it may be more of an art than a science, those involved in a country’s post-conflict recovery must identify an effective way to utilize the expertise and commitment of local groups to achieve lasting peace and prosperity.
Published Date: January 08, 2007