Tag Archives: economic growth

Why Institutions are Essential to Entrepreneurship

Fast-growing economies have institutions that allow entrepreneurs to take risks. (Photo: Businessweek)

Fast-growing economies have institutions that allow entrepreneurs to take risks. (Photo: Businessweek)

Why is it that some economies adapt to change and produce long-run growth, while others stall? We observe that in the adaptive economies, entrepreneurs drive change and innovation. So why then do talented entrepreneurs play a leading role in a few societies and yet hit the wall in others? What causes entrepreneurs to make the leap from dealing in guilds and bazaars to participating in global markets?

Mary Shirley, President of the Ronald Coase Institute, digs deeply to explain how fundamental institutions make all the difference. In “Why Institutions Are Essential to Entrepreneurship,” new from CIPE’s Economic Reform Feature Service, Dr. Shirley offers clear insights into the mechanisms that facilitate exchange and reduce the risks of being an entrepreneur. Societies that lack these institutions — the limited access societies — fail to unleash the entrepreneurial drive. However, those that nourish creative business endeavors improve their long-run economic performance.

This article is part of a forthcoming CIPE report on Creating the Environment for Entrepreneurial Success.

Driving Economic Growth in Bolivia: Insitutions and Productivity

Lack of technology -- or weak institutions?

Lack of technology — or weak institutions? (Photo: Wikimedia commons)

Sergio Daga is a CIPE-Atlas Corps Think Tank LINKS  Fellow serving at the Heritage Foundation.

According to empirical studies, high rates of economic growth over the long-term (in per capita terms) result in better living standards for people in every country. The main force for high, long-term economic growth rate is productivity gains – finding better ways to efficiently use production factors such as natural resources, labor, physical and human capital.

Lora and Pagés explain that, compared to other regions in the world, the relatively lower growth of productivity is the main determinant of the poor economic growth rates in Latin American countries.  They also argue that it has also prevented the region from closing income gaps and economic development levels with developed economies. Therefore, the achievement of higher productivity should be the epicenter of the current economic debate in Latin American countries.

How can we foster productivity? Productivity gains are usually associated with increases in technological progress of a country, but some argue that this is a complex problem that goes beyond that. In fact, depending on the country’s level of development, technological readiness could be a necessary condition but not a sufficient one.

For low-middle income countries, such as the majority of Latin American countries, productivity gains could be achieved by making progress towards what the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report calls “the fundamental pillars for development.” One of the most important pillars is having a sound and fair institutional environment.

CONTINUE READING

Empowering Women = Economic Growth

(Chart: The Economist)

Supporting economic growth is an important and overarching goal for all countries worldwide. How countries go about doing so, however, particularly in the developing world, is a subject of much debate.

Take Egypt for example. Many academics, government officials, and economists have proposed solutions to Egypt’s economic woes that involve cutting subsidies, increasing exports, and supporting entrepreneurship.

But a recent report by Booz and Company (as reported on by the Economist) indicates that there is one simple answer: women.

According to the report, if female employment rates matched those of men, Egypt’s GDP would grow 34 percent by 2020. While that is impressive on its own, imagine if other necessary reforms also took place, such as tackling Egypt’s food subsidies, or increasing Egyptian exports.

Egypt’s case is salient because of its largely untapped pool of female labor—Egypt’s female labor-participation rate is below 30 percent. But Egypt is not alone in the vast economic benefits possible by employing men and women at equal levels.

For instance India, the world’s second most populous country, has much to gain by employing more women. The Booz report indicates that India’s GDP would grow over 25 percent by 2020 if female employment matched male employment. Similarly, even countries solidly in the “developed country” category such as the United States, Britain, and France would see their GDP grow by 4 or 5 percent.

While this exercise may be hypothetical, it is certainly illustrative of the broader economic benefits of employing women. Women’s unemployment is not just a “women’s” problem. With the numbers behind them, countries that get behind empowering women in the workplace stand achieve significant economic gains, delivering more economic benefits to all.

Why Girls Matter: Celebrating the International Day of the Girl Child

As today marks the inaugural United Nation’s International Day of Girl Child, a day to promote girls’ human rights, let’s reflect on why it matters to invest in girls.

Study after study has shown that education for girls and women has ripple effects within the family and across societies. Girls who have been educated are more likely to marry later in life, have smaller and healthier families, and have greater job prospects.

CONTINUE READING

An African Moment in a Risky World

 

(Photo: China Daily)

The effects of the global economic crises of 2008 are still being felt in the United States and Europe, in the form of persistent unemployment, sovereign debt crises, and stagnant demand. Now, the fallout from the slowdown could begin to affect the unique economic relationship between China and Africa.

Over the last three decades, the Chinese Communist Party has ensured its political dominance by delivering consistent economic growth and development. China’s economic model is a turbo-charged version of the authoritarian approach developed in Singapore under Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. The essence of this model is state-directed heavy investments in labor-intensive economic sectors, leveraging China’s comparative advantage in low unit cost of production (cheap labor) in order to establish a strong export-based economy.

However, the global economic slowdown – especially the economic challenges facing the United States and Europe – coupled with rapidly rising wages in China, implies ever less demand for Chinese exports. A decrease in economic growth and economic development will call the legitimacy of the Chinese Communist Party into question. To avert such political fallout, the Chinese state will need to shift its economic model from being reliant to exports to one that is based on consumption by a large and increasingly wealthy domestic market. This means adopting structural economic reforms that will make domestic consumption a greater part of economic output.

China is Africa’s biggest trading partner and one of its biggest sources of foreign direct investment (FDI). Chinese FDI to and trade with Africa, as well as other nations, focuses mainly on the natural resource sector. This gives China particular leverage in Africa, where governments and economic elites are often financed primarily by the exploitation of primary commodities such as oil and gas, minerals, cocoa, cotton, and other cash crops. But a Chinese economy that is less reliant on massive exports is also one that needs to import less raw materials and primary commodities for its manufacturing sector. This has significant implications for Africa.

In the case of Nigeria, for example, oil and gas play a disproportionately important role in the financial system and government finances, accounting for over 90 percent of exports and government revenues, but only thirteen percent of economic output. Many other countries in Africa share similar structural economic distortions. The inherent risk is that the economic challenges facing some of the world’s biggest economies– the United States, the European Union, and China – will lead to less trade with and FDI flow into Africa. Should such a possibility become manifest, then the political consequences for African political elites would be dire.

Africa, in general, has many of the requisite elements for high economic growth. Demographically, its population is young and growing – on average, sixty percent of the continent’s population is below the age of thirty. This promises a bountiful long-term supply of labor. Though infrastructure is sorely lacking due to decades of poor maintenance and graft, there are vast swaths of unexploited arable land that would form the foundation for a vibrant agro-industrial economy.

To leverage these favorable factors, and deliver sustainable economic growth and development to their populations, African governments depend on inflows of FDI – which bring not only much-needed capital, but also technology and expertise. In the last decade, an increase in FDI inflows to Africa accounts for the robust positive economic growth trends that the region has experienced. As proof, the African middle class is now 350 million strong, spending about $700 billion annually. At current trends, the African middle class is expected to grow to one billion people by the year 2050.

But with the economic headwinds facing the European Union and the United States, along with impending structural adjustments to China’s economy, FDI flows to Africa are projected to slow. This is prompting increasing competition among African states over a shrinking pool of investment capital. To achieve competitive advantage in attracting investment capital, many African nations are now embarking on structural economic reforms to improve the investment climate in their economies. Reforms such as better fiscal consolidation, privatization of state-owned enterprises, power sector deregulation, legal and judiciary reforms, and legislative initiatives such as Freedom of Information Acts are becoming more commonplace throughout Africa.

The prevailing wisdom is that an entrepreneurial market economy is the best solution for the swelling youthful populations of Africa. The importance of FDI to achieving this objective is widely recognized among African political elites. The contest for FDI is prompting transformational economic reforms across the continent.

The increasing economic pressures on African political elites make them more disposed to political reforms that are required for an enabling business environment. These changes would also make Africa a more desirable target for US business investment beyond the natural resources sector, including consumer products and services, infrastructure (telecoms, power, transportation, real estate), the budding financial sector (insurance, banking), and agriculture (agro value-chains). For US corporations, opportunities abound and the time is right.

Lights Out for Business

A man cooks by candlelight at a small roadside shop. (Photo: AP)

For the last several days, half of India’s population — HALF — has been without electrical power. That’s 600 million people, twice the population of the United States, trying to keep on about their lives without lights, public transportation, or utilities. That’s tens of millions of businesses losing income, product, and potentially livelihoods.

Last month a powerful, fast-moving storm called a derecho disrupted power for hundreds of thousands of people in the Washington, DC area. We all complained mightily, but most suffered little more harm than some spoiled food and a few days without air conditioning. In many places around the world, including India, a few days without power is not at all unusual. In fact, daily brownouts or blackouts are sometimes the norm. Many established firms and wealthy individuals adapt by installing batteries or generators — a drain on the economy. But how can small and medium-sized businesses and entrepreneurs survive and thrive in such uncertainty?

When power is unreliable or inaccessible, businesses and businesspeople suffer. An appropriate, adaptable infrastructure is crucial for economic development and growth, and governments must make it a priority. Investing in infrastructure doesn’t mean simply that the lights stay on. It means that power is available for offices, factories, schools, and hospitals. It means that roads are clear and available to transport goods and services. It means that water is clean and accessible for public consumption, as well as for manufacturing and agriculture.

Infrastructure is not cheap, and many nations believe they have more pressing needs. As India swelters in the dark, however, it is worth remembering that investing in infrastructure is worth it.

A Third Way in Malaysia

Prime Minister Najib Razak delivers a progress update on the Economic Transformation Program. (Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg)

Around the world, in both developed and developing countries, citizens are debating the proper role for government and the private sector in creating jobs, encouraging economic growth, and providing public services. While this debate often paints the private sector and government as opponents, a recent Forbes magazine article by CIPE Board Member Michael Hershman, co-founder of Transparency International, describes a more cooperative model of partnership between the public and private sectors now being tried in Malaysia.

Public-private partnerships have become the norm in many countries, but they are usually limited to specific projects or goals: for example, constructing a major piece of infrastructure like a bridge or highway, or providing health or education services to an under-served population.  Malaysia’s Economic Transformation Program (ETP) and Government Transformation Program (GTP) take this idea one step further, envisioning a wide-reaching model of cooperation between the government and private businesses. As part of these programs, the government pledged to implement a variety of measures, from reducing corruption to instituting anti-corruption courts, to increase private-sector competitiveness and level the economic playing field.

The third pathway of progressive government in partnership with a vibrant private sector has been powering Malaysia towards its goals and helping to create a better life for its citizens.

So far, Hershman writes, the model has been remarkably successful. Malaysia has made progress on a number of social goals, such as cutting street crime by 35% and expanding low-income housing, while at the same time moving ahead of Germany, Japan, and Switzerland on the World Bank’s competitiveness rankings and posting the highest Gross Domestic Product in the country’s history. However, Hershman notes that more challenges remain, especially as the program begins to tackle some of Malaysia’s lingering history of social exclusion and discrimination against ethnic minority groups.

Read the original article at Forbes.