A conference organized by the Center for International Private
Enterprise (CIPE) and The Ronald Coase Institute
Introduction to the conference
|
| 
Watch
the Video |
“Latin America
stands out from the rest of the developing world because
of its particularly strong reform history, both by democratization
and the debt crisis. However, after a period of moderate
economic growth and political stability, the region
faces new economic and political challenges that must
be addressed. CIPE believes that in order to cope with
these changes, it is fundamental to bring to the surface
connections between institutions and how they function,
between democratic development, as the keys to opening
up and unlocking the creativity of the people of the
hemisphere. This conference brings together international
experts and many ideas on how to generate economic change
and most important, on how leaders in the region can
get reforms in place.”
John D. Sullivan
Center for International Private Enterprise, USA |
| |
|
|
|
“In order to adapt to a dynamic
world of continues change, Latin American countries
need to improve institutional and economical performance.
But before confronting these important challenges and
undergo a fundamental transformation, leaders in the
region must understand the existing structure of the
economy and the transaction costs. They ought to review
the history and background of their countries and how
institutions work, so that they can identify possible
limitations to change. Once they are aware of these
structural issues, they will then be ready to improve
the way the game is played.”
Douglass North
Nobel Prize Winner, Washington University, USA |
| |
|
Panel on Transaction Costs
|
|
“Academics and
entrepreneurs throughout the hemisphere are deeply concerned
about how we can become more efficient when it comes
to measuring transaction costs. Our new instrument [systematic
survey] which we call the cost of exchange, measures
elements of transaction cost from the perspective of
individuals who are involved in the transaction themselves.
Our methodology goes back to the idea of having some
basic understanding of the processes and institutions
in each country, and then developing a strategic survey.”
Lee Benham
Ronald Coase Institute, USA |
| |
|
|
“By using the same methodology
developed by the Ronald Coase Institute, we designed
a very meticulous survey to measure the cost to register
formally in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Our interest was to look
at the real world, not the hypothetical world, so we
went directly to the entrepreneurs and worked with them.
According to our initial findings, we can observe some
progress, but there is still a lot to learn from other
countries. Hence market reforms must continue throughout
the region.”
Decio Zylbersztajn
University of Sao Paulo, Brazil |
| |
|
|
“Since we have common problems
in many Latin American countries, one particularly powerful
aspect of this methodology is that it can allow comparisons
using essentially the same instruments to measure the
cost of entry firms. In the case of Lima, Peru were
we surveyed around 120 firms, we found that most firms
have a period in which they operate informally before
they start the processes of registering and acting formally.
Our survey shows how a vast majority of owners are willing
to become formal in order to access new clients and
suppliers, thus, formality is not just a matter of getting
entry into the market, it’s also a question of
staying in the market.”
Miguel Jaramillo
Instituto Apoyo, Peru |
|
|
Roundtable Discussion on Transaction Costs and Institutional Change
|
|
“In order to alleviate the
bureaucratic burden that affects our countries we must
establish a permanent dialogue between the production
sector and the government. At the end of the day, entrepreneurs
and politicians have to know that formality is cheaper
that informality for growth and that simplification
is possible and is the pathway for development and job
creation.”
Sr. Alencar Burti
Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e
Pequenas Empresas, Brazil |
| |
|
| |
“Politicians and business owners
must work together to strengthen the relationship between
the state and the market by showing the importance of
institutions for the operation of markets in the development
of our nations. By having better laws, an efficient
public sector and common values, we are reducing transactions
costs and creating incentives to formalize the economy.”
Guilherme Afif
Domingos
Associacao Comercial, Brazil |
| |
|
Roundtable
Discussion on Reducing Transaction Costs in Brazil
|
| |
“The rules of the game are
changing in Latin America. In the case of Brazil, we
are experiencing gigantic changes. We have the overlapping
of the old traditions in terms of mentality and institutions
and the new vision which emphasizes simplification,
transparency and the rule of law. We definitely have
new challenges, that is why Brazilians have started
a path of no return, there is no going back to an institutional
environment of the past, we must continue looking for
new initiatives and taking advantage of our resources.”
Dr. Mailson da
Nobrega
Former Minister of Finance, Brazil |
| |
|
| |
“There is an extremely rich
case to be analyzed in terms of large institutional
reforms in Brazil. If we look at the country’s
history, we find that all important reforms, like the
creation of income tax and the social security system
have taken place within authoritarian regimes, all of
them dictated by a strong central power. The big question
then, is why are changes slow when they are conducted
in a democratic environment? Is that becoming a trend
in Latin American Countries?”
Dr. Guilherme
Dias
Faculty of Economics, University of Sao Paolo, Brazil |
| |
|
Pursuing
a Reform Agenda in Latin America, Part 1
|
|
“Among the many challenges
Latin American countries face, is the need to change
the concept of governance, from one of rule and control
to one of providing services for constituents. Governments
should be limited and dedicated to protecting liberties
and not imposing a false order. Leaders in the hemisphere
have an enormous compromise with public education; citizens
in the local communities should be allowed to participate
in the decision making process and learn how to manage
their own government, this is what democracy is all
about.”
Steve Johnson
The Heritage Foundation, USA |
| |
|
|
“Venezuela is a perfect example
of how historically many of our countries have had to
deal with political crisis and at the same time pursue
a reform agenda. This is obviously an extremely hard
task. The business and think tank community has played
a key role in contributing to this effort. Our involvement
includes working with political, social and labor leaders
to influence national public policy and working at the
grassroots level especially with the informal economy.”
Aurelio Concheso
Center for the Dissemination of Economic Knowledge,
Venezuela |
| |
|
|
“Even though Central American
countries have been quite successful in implementing
economic reforms, there is still a lot to do in order
to integrate to the world markets. If we are looking
ahead to become part of a hemispheric free trade zone,
we must enhance the dialogue between the private and
public sectors to push a new reform agenda that should
include competitiveness, a bureaucratic reduction and
the removal of basic obstacles for doing everyday business.”
Hugo Maul
National Economic Research Center, Guatemala |
| |
|
| |
“The Argentinean
case is a good example of how reform is possible even
under a stressful context. Our strategy was centered
on promoting an intense national dialogue in order
to restore confidence between the entrepreneurs and
the government. At the end, we were able to put together
a very challenging agenda that included changes in
the legal framework, such as property rights, a judicial
reform, the strengthening of public institutions and
a tax policy reform.”
Nicolas Ducote
Center for the Implementation of Public Policies Promoting
Equity and Growth, Argentina
|
| |
|
| |
“The negotiations concerning
the creation of the Free Trade Area of the Americas
(FTAA) have understandably attracted the interest not
only of specialists but also of the wider public. Most
Brazilians seem to be quit skeptical about this idea;
many don’t even know why they are against it.
We at the Instituto Liberal believe that the idea of
free trade is good. However, we also realize that we
have to continue promoting and explaining the benefits
of free trade.”
Roberto Fendt
Institute for Legal and Regulatory Studies, Brazil |
| |
|
Pursuing
a Reform Agenda in Latin America, Part 2
|
| |
There have been several
key advances in corporate governance in Brazil over
the last five years. There is a new public companies
law and new corporate governance requirements for
listing on the Novo Mercado of the Sao Paolo Stock
Exchange. Our new project with CIPE is looking to
identify strategies to strengthen corporate governance
within family-owned firms.
Douglas Monaco
Brazilian Institute of Corporate Governance, Brazil
|
|
|
| |
“There is a big debate going
on about the need to promote corporate governance in
emerging and transitional economies. The case of Colombia
is quite unique. Our organization has been successful
in selling these new concepts to local entrepreneurs.
Our movement has reached all sorts of audiences including
students, journalists, public officials, scholars and
small owners. It’s only about being creative and
working with the right people.”
Paola Gutierrez
Colombian Confederation of Chambers of Commerce, Colombia |
| |
|
|
“We are convinced
that in order to reduce corruption in our region,
there is a need for some kind of compromise from the
private sector. In the case of Colombia, there are
some improvements. Confecamaras has worked jointly
with the business community and local politicians
and has launched a broad strategy that includes the
promotion of codes of ethical conduct and increasing
efficiency and transparency in the use of public resources”
Harvey Rodriguez
Colombian Confederation of Chambers of Commerce, Colombia
|
| |
|
|
“Many people in the region
say that the Washington Consensus and the economic reforms
of the last decade have been a total failure. People
argue that economic growth has not been achieved and
even worse, corruption has increased. However, are people
really informed about what is behind these reforms?
Or maybe, they are being influenced by the so called
neo-populist movement? If we expect to move forward
with our liberal agenda we must change the strategy
of how we are communicating our ideas throughout the
hemisphere.”
Rafael Merchan
Political Science Institute, Colombia |
| |
|
| |
“Why are so many Latin American
legislators losing interest in our reform agenda?
What are we doing wrong to lose those who should be
our key allies? The answer is simple. We have been
unable to send a coherent and well developed message
about what are the benefits of implementing institutional
reforms. We believe that the best strategy is to share
our reform experiences, the relationship between our
countries is very important for any reform process.”
Roberto Carvalho
Instituto Atlantico, Brazil
|
| |
|
| |
“Chile is said to be a success
story, many people in the region talk about the Chilean
case. Let me tell you why we were able to succeed. Our
government was able to make reforms in a coherent way,
in a much more radical and profound way. One of the
best examples is the way we changed the electoral law,
creating a majoritarian rule, which facilitated agreements
between members of Congress. This is an example of an
institution that is a key element of our success.”
Cristian Larroulet
Freedom and Development, Chile |